Mile News

Coach Pat McGregor: Breaking 4:30 in a Sub-4 World

March 01, 2019

Other helpful influences include the campaign to “Bring Back the Mile” and summer Mile track festivals that draw large crowds and prize money.

By Pat McGregor, FloTrack

Indoor track season is in full tilt, and opportunities for men to crack the elusive 4 minute Mile are as abundant as ever.

Year-after-year, some have to see "4:00" flash next to their names and leave meets wondering if they’ll ever get under the coveted mark. Some say it’s the only reason they continue to compete after college—they yearn to be in the same select club as the runners who inspired them to pursue such a difficult endeavor.

I personally felt an enormous burden lifted from my shoulders when I ran under 4 minutes; I could move on to the next dream in my life. I’m sure if I continued, faster times would've come, but the juice just wasn’t worth the squeeze for me. Improving from 3:58 to 3:54 wasn’t appealing; however, if I hadn’t gotten under 4:00 that day, I would've definitely continued running. Breaking the 4 minute Mile was the only way I felt validated as a good runner.

Yeah, I was little crazy—my commitment to breaking 4 became my identity.

Apart from getting on the “Go Go Juice,” I would have done just about anything. But is breaking 4 really that hard? The popular opinion among track enthusiasts seems to be that it’s not, and that it's far easier than the 4:30 “equivalent” barrier for women.

In 2018, an annual record 29 American men dipped under 4 minutes for the first time. Overall since 1975, the number of U.S. women who have broken 4:30 currently sits at 78.

Based on this statistic, you could say the two standards are not comparable, and many would agree that 4:30 is a relatively harder standard. I’m sure it’s more convenient to use 4:30, a round number, than it is using the less marketable 4:34, but 4:34 is probably closer to an equivalent standard. The current women's andmen's American records, by Mary Decker Slaney (4:16.71) and Alan Webb (3:46.91), are practically equidistant from 4:00 and 4:30.

So why is there such a disparity between the vaunted milestones? Perhaps there is more nuance to these two barriers than previously believed

Continue reading at:

Tags: pat mcgregor (1) , flotrack (3)

Facebook Comments

Return the Mile to prominence on the American & worldwide sports and cultural landscape by elevating and celebrating the Mile to create a movement.

Bring Back the Mile as the premier event in the sport, and increase interest in and media coverage of the Mile for both those who love the distance as well as the general public.

Bring Back the Mile to celebrate the storied distance and to recognize the people who made and make the Mile great and to promote Mile events and the next generation of U.S. Milers.

Bring Back the Mile to create a national movement for the Mile as America’s Distance,
to inspire Americans to run the Mile as part of their fitness program and to replace the 1600 meters at High School State Track & Field Meets across the country.

Become a Mile Maniac member or a BBTM sponsor today! Join us, and go Mile!

Join Us

Thanks for joining the movement and being a Mile Maniac. We'll keep you up to-date with our Mile wires as well as exclusive contests and opportunities. Help us spread the word by sharing our site and joining us on Facebook, Twitter & Instagram!